<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: POW: Codec Buddy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sexysexypenguins.com/2007/11/07/pow-codec-buddy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sexysexypenguins.com/2007/11/07/pow-codec-buddy/</link>
	<description>I love the smell of &#34;Free Software&#34; in the morning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:14:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: herlo</title>
		<link>http://sexysexypenguins.com/2007/11/07/pow-codec-buddy/comment-page-1/#comment-6446</link>
		<dc:creator>herlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fedora-tutorials.com/2007/11/07/pow-codec-buddy/#comment-6446</guid>
		<description>Rahul,

When I did this demo, the first dialog you mention didn&#039;t pop up.  I noticed on the Fedora spec page for this that it was supposed to be there, but in my version, no dice.  I did do it with Rawhide two days before Werewolf was released, but it should have been in there by then, don&#039;t you think?

As far as Fedora gaining monetarily, that&#039;s not my concern.  My concern is that *only* one option is available, there should be more than one in the name of competition.  I&#039;m glad that it&#039;ll be possible to do this in the future, so I&#039;m excited.

Cheers,

Herlo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rahul,</p>
<p>When I did this demo, the first dialog you mention didn&#8217;t pop up.  I noticed on the Fedora spec page for this that it was supposed to be there, but in my version, no dice.  I did do it with Rawhide two days before Werewolf was released, but it should have been in there by then, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>As far as Fedora gaining monetarily, that&#8217;s not my concern.  My concern is that *only* one option is available, there should be more than one in the name of competition.  I&#8217;m glad that it&#8217;ll be possible to do this in the future, so I&#8217;m excited.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Herlo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Halsey</title>
		<link>http://sexysexypenguins.com/2007/11/07/pow-codec-buddy/comment-page-1/#comment-6396</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Halsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fedora-tutorials.com/2007/11/07/pow-codec-buddy/#comment-6396</guid>
		<description>One thing I&#039;m not clear about is: what happens if there is a security update or bug fix or enhancement? Would I need to purchase the MPEG codec again?

I think maybe a better approach that fits in better with Fedora&#039;s package management infrastructure is for Fluendo to setup a yum repo, like Adobe did for Flash:

http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2007/06/new_installation_method.html

That way I can get security updates and bug fixes for these codecs the same way I get all my updates. And you&#039;d get yum&#039;s dependency resolution magic if needed as well.

Of course, when yum accesses the fluendo repo, some type of account authentication must happen so that the customer has access only to the codecs he/she has purchased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I&#8217;m not clear about is: what happens if there is a security update or bug fix or enhancement? Would I need to purchase the MPEG codec again?</p>
<p>I think maybe a better approach that fits in better with Fedora&#8217;s package management infrastructure is for Fluendo to setup a yum repo, like Adobe did for Flash:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2007/06/new_installation_method.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2007/06/new_installation_method.html</a></p>
<p>That way I can get security updates and bug fixes for these codecs the same way I get all my updates. And you&#8217;d get yum&#8217;s dependency resolution magic if needed as well.</p>
<p>Of course, when yum accesses the fluendo repo, some type of account authentication must happen so that the customer has access only to the codecs he/she has purchased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Sundaram</title>
		<link>http://sexysexypenguins.com/2007/11/07/pow-codec-buddy/comment-page-1/#comment-6379</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Sundaram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fedora-tutorials.com/2007/11/07/pow-codec-buddy/#comment-6379</guid>
		<description>The first dialog that pops up in step 1 has a short explanation. Click on the link about proprietary and free formats for a longer explanation. In short Fluendo has licensed these codecs from various organizations and are passing on the cost to the end users except in the case of MP3 where they have paid to acquire a license but is given to Fedora users for free. This is not a commercial arrangement and Fedora doesn&#039;t get any monetary benefits out of it. 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/Codeina

Also refer, 

http://www.linux.com/feature/120703

Other distributions might point to other repositories which are ok for users in regions that don&#039;t enforce software patents and we were waiting on confirmation from Red Hat legal to do something similar as a alternative. Looks like we can now.

http://lwn.net/Articles/257559/

If you have any other questions, let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first dialog that pops up in step 1 has a short explanation. Click on the link about proprietary and free formats for a longer explanation. In short Fluendo has licensed these codecs from various organizations and are passing on the cost to the end users except in the case of MP3 where they have paid to acquire a license but is given to Fedora users for free. This is not a commercial arrangement and Fedora doesn&#8217;t get any monetary benefits out of it. </p>
<p><a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/Codeina" rel="nofollow">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/Codeina</a></p>
<p>Also refer, </p>
<p><a href="http://www.linux.com/feature/120703" rel="nofollow">http://www.linux.com/feature/120703</a></p>
<p>Other distributions might point to other repositories which are ok for users in regions that don&#8217;t enforce software patents and we were waiting on confirmation from Red Hat legal to do something similar as a alternative. Looks like we can now.</p>
<p><a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/257559/" rel="nofollow">http://lwn.net/Articles/257559/</a></p>
<p>If you have any other questions, let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
